BARBOUR v. WILLIAMS et al
Plaintiff: DWAYNE BARBOUR
Defendant: DAMIEN WILLIAMS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE
Case Number: 1:2022cv01844
Filed: June 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Emmet G Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Gale, Rachel)
August 23, 2022 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by DAMIEN WILLIAMS. (Gale, Rachel)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 08/01/22. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1) (mac)
July 29, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant District Of Columbia Answer Or Otherwise Response To The Complaint due by 8/26/2022, (mac)
July 22, 2022 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Gale, Rachel)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #3 consent motion to extend time to respond to the Complaint. Defendant District of Columbia shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by no later than August 26, 2022. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 7/22/2022. (lcegs3)
June 29, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DAMIEN WILLIAMS, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg)
June 29, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (znmg)
June 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DAMIEN WILLIAMS with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9335934) filed by DWAYNE BARBOUR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Falodun, Oluwole)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARBOUR v. WILLIAMS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DWAYNE BARBOUR
Represented By: Oluwole Falodun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAMIEN WILLIAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Represented By: Rachel Beth Gale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?