GEBRETSADIKE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
Plaintiff: AWOKE GEBRETSADIKE
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Unknown Employees of District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and UNKNOWN NAMES OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES EMPLOYEES
Case Number: 1:2022cv01951
Filed: July 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Royce C Lamberth
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Gale, Rachel)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Receipt of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number: 2022 CA 002216 B. (zjf)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Answer due by 8/12/2022. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 07/12/2022. (lcrcl3)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Gale, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA re #3 Substitution of Counsel . (Gale, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by Rachel Beth Gale on behalf of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Substituting for attorney Christina Okereke (Gale, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (znmg)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2022 CA 002216 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Superior Court Documents)(Okereke, Christina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GEBRETSADIKE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AWOKE GEBRETSADIKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Represented By: Christina Okereke
Represented By: Rachel Beth Gale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Employees of District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN NAMES OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES EMPLOYEES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?