CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER |
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION |
1:2022cv01976 |
July 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
James E Boasberg |
Other Statutory Actions |
02 U.S.C. ยง 437 Federal Election Commission |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER. Attorney Richard Samuel Horan terminated. (Horan, Richard) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Samuel Horan on behalf of CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER (Horan, Richard) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION served on 7/13/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(McAllen, Megan) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/14/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(McAllen, Megan) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 07/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(McAllen, Megan) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of RICHARD SAMUEL HORAN. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/15/2022. (lcjeb2) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zmh) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Richard Samuel Horan, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9357446. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard Samuel Horan in support of admission pro hac vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Admission and Good Standing)(McAllen, Megan) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER (McAllen, Megan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9357230) filed by CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(McAllen, Megan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER | |
Represented By: | Megan P. McAllen |
Represented By: | Richard Samuel Horan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.