KHAMIDOVA et al v. BLINKEN et al
Plaintiff: ZULFIYA KHAMIDOVA and NEKRUZ KHAMIDOV
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN, MORGAN D. MILES and EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI
Case Number: 1:2022cv01990
Filed: July 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: John D Bates
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Curtis Lee Morrison (Morrison, Curtis)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/15/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/13/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 7/22/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 8/5/2022; MORGAN D. MILES served on 7/25/2022; EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI served on 8/5/2022 (Morrison, Curtis)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, MORGAN D. MILES, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjm)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zsb)
July 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY BLINKEN, MORGAN D. MILES, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9359482) filed by ZULFIYA KHAMIDOVA, NEKRUZ KHAMIDOV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B1, #3 Exhibit B2, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Summons US Attorney, #6 Summons Garland, #7 Summons Blinken, #8 Summons Miles, #9 Summons Ramotowski, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morrison, Curtis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KHAMIDOVA et al v. BLINKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZULFIYA KHAMIDOVA
Represented By: Curtis Lee Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NEKRUZ KHAMIDOV
Represented By: Curtis Lee Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORGAN D. MILES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?