DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE et al
| OSCAR DANTZLER |
| THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, CLAIBORNE W. BROWN, L.L.C., CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP, UNITED STATES EASTERN COURT, UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT COURT and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE |
| 1:2022cv02003 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice of the Defendants, The U.S. Department of Justice Office, and The U.S. Department of Justice Office through the Attorney General, Merrick B. Garland Individually and in his capacity as the U.S. Attorney General sand their Agents one - five and The U.S. District Judge Jay Zainey and the U.S. Magistrate Judge Hanis Van Meerveld by OSCAR DANTZLER. (zjm)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Mandamus filed by OSCAR DANTZLER.(zjm)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS (9) Issued Electronically as to CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Through Ashley Edwards Bass individually and in her capacity as an attorney), CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Indigo K. Diekmann individually and in her capacity as an associate attorney with Cashe Coudrain & Bass, LLP), CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Through Jamie Polozola Gomez individually and in her capacity as an associate attorney with Cashe Coudrain & Bass, LLP, and their agents one through five ), CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Through Andre Coudrain individually and in his capacity as an attorney), CLAIBORNE W. BROWN, L.L.C., MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE, UNITED STATES EASTERN COURT, UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT COURT. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for a CM/ECF Password. Plaintiff shall complete the Clerk's Office on-line tutorial. The Court expects all electronic filings by pro se litigants to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. See https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/court-info/local-rules-and-orders/local-rules. Non-compliant filings may be stricken. SO ORDERED by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 7/25/2022. (lccrc1)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for CM/ECF Password to E-File CM/ECF Pleadings by OSCAR DANTZLER. (zjm)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zmh)
|
|
Summons (9) Issued as to CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Through Ashley Edwards Bass individually and in her capacity as an attorney), CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Indigo K. Diekmann individually and in her capacity as an associate attorney with Cashe Coudrain & Bass, LLP), CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Through Jamie Polozola Gomez individually and in her capacity as an associate attorney with Cashe Coudrain & Bass, LLP, and their agents one through five ), CASHE COUDRAIN & BASS, LLP(Through Andre Coudrain individually and in his capacity as an attorney), CLAIBORNE W. BROWN, L.L.C., MERRICK B. GARLAND, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE. Summonses and notice of consent were sent to pro se plaintiff address. (zmh)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 21037705313.) filed by OSCAR DANTZLER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons)(zmh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
