CHOWDHURY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH et al
| EBRAHIM CHOWDHURY and ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY |
| MUHAMMAD MASUDUL HAQUE, MUHAMMAD FARUQE TALUKDER SOHEL, AL-HAJ MUHAMMAD NASHIR UDDING, MUHAMMAD HAFIZUR RAHMAN, GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH and SOHAG PARIBAHAN LIMITED |
| 1:2022cv02033 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 07/27/2022. (Attachment: #1 Copy of 12/07/20 Memorandum Opinion, 20-cv-3294) (znmg)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by EBRAHIM CHOWDHURY. (rj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by EBRAHIM CHOWDHURY.(rj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 7/8/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (rj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
