WEBB v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
| MIKE WEBB doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY and MIKE WEBB Major doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY |
| DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION and FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION |
| 1:2022cv02034 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (see Order for full details) Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 07/27/2022. (znmg)
|
| Filing 3 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MIKE WEBB. (rj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MIKE WEBB. (rj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by MIKE WEBB.(rj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 7/11/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (rj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WEBB v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MIKE WEBB doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MIKE WEBB Major doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
