BROWN v. U.S. SUPREME COURT et al
Plaintiff: THURMAN JEROME BROWN
Defendant: U.S. SUPREME COURT, NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK and COUNTY OF NASSAU
Case Number: 1:2022cv02042
Filed: July 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order by THURMAN JEROME BROWN. (zjm)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER dismissing case. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on August 5, 2022. (lcckk1)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Not Issued as to All Defendants (znmg)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (znmg)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number: 202719. (znmg)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (see Order for full details) Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 07/25/2022. (znmg)
July 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by THURMAN JEROME BROWN. (ztnr)
July 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COUNTY OF NASSAU, NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, and U.S. SUPREME COURT with Jury Demand filed by THURMAN JEROME BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztnr)
July 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 7/9/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (ztnr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROWN v. U.S. SUPREME COURT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THURMAN JEROME BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. SUPREME COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF NASSAU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?