CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. v. CPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al
| UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. D/B/A ROCKINGHAM STEEL, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. D/B/A ROCKINGHAM STEEL and CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. United States, for the use and benefit of doing business as ROCKINGHAM STEEL |
| CPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2022cv02169 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 Miller Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.(Garcia, Eduardo) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by CPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC..(Garcia, Eduardo) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zsb) |
| Filing 5 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. (Tate, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Order, filed by CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC., UNITED STATES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Tate, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 ERRATA by CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC., UNITED STATES. (Attachments: #1 Errata Notice of Errata)(Tate, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by UNITED STATES, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. filed by UNITED STATES, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC..(Tate, Christopher) |
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause, on or before August 2, 2022, why this case should not be dismissed given Plaintiff's failure to remedy the errors that the Clerk's Office has identified with his filing and ordered Plaintiff to correct on July 26, 2022. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on July 29, 2022. (lccjn3)
|
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to crt@fplegal.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 3. Form filed as fillable PDF. Please file form in a non-fillable PDF format., 4. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9391090) filed by UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. D/B/A ROCKINGHAM STEEL, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. D/B/A ROCKINGHAM STEEL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to CPP Construction Company, Inc., #3 Summons to Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2)(Tate, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. v. CPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. D/B/A ROCKINGHAM STEEL | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Tate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. D/B/A ROCKINGHAM STEEL | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Tate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. United States, for the use and benefit of doing business as ROCKINGHAM STEEL | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Tate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Eduardo S. Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Eduardo S. Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
