NOROOZI v. BLINKEN et al
Plaintiff: JILA NOROOZI
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, US Attorney MATTHEW M. GRAVES, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ETHAN GOLDRICH, RICHARD VISEK and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Case Number: 1:2022cv02185
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Beryl A Howell
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 08/25/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/29/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/28/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 8/25/2022; ETHAN GOLDRICH served on 8/25/2022; UR MENDOZA JADDOU served on 8/25/2022; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 8/25/2022; RICHARD VISEK served on 8/26/2022; CHRISTOPHER WRAY served on 8/25/2022 (Attachments: #1 POS for Mayorkas, #2 POS for Jaddou, #3 POS for Garland, #4 POS for Graves, #5 POS for Visek, #6 POS for Wray, #7 POS for Goldrich)(Aramesh, Arash)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on July 29, 2022. (lcbah2)
July 29, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh)
July 29, 2022 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zmh)
July 28, 2022 Filing 2 ERRATA w/Complaint by JILA NOROOZI. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Aramesh, Arash)
July 28, 2022 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to aramesh@arameshlaw.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Filing fee not paid. Please remit payment using the event Payment of Fee-Complaint., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmh, )
July 28, 2022 Payment for #1 Complaint,. ($402; Receipt number ADCDC-9402157). (Aramesh, Arash)
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by JILA NOROOZI. (Attachments: #1 Summons NOROOZI, #2 Summons BLINKEN, #3 Summons JADDOU, #4 Summons MAYORKAS, #5 Summons GARLAND, #6 Summons GRAVES, #7 Summons GOLDRICH, #8 Summons VISEK, #9 Summons WRAY)(Aramesh, Arash)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NOROOZI v. BLINKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JILA NOROOZI
Represented By: Arash Aramesh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney MATTHEW M. GRAVES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ETHAN GOLDRICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD VISEK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?