CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Plaintiff: CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Case Number: 1:2022cv02246
Filed: July 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Answer to #1 due by 10/7/2022. (dot)
September 6, 2022 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT. (McBride, Patricia)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' #8 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time, filed September 6, 2022. Counsel for Defendants represents that she requires additional time to confer with agency counsel before filing an answer. Accordingly, Defendants request an extension of time, from September 8, 2022 to October 7, 2022, to answer Plaintiff's #1 complaint. As Plaintiff consents, and upon good cause shown, Defendants' #8 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #1 complaint on or before October 7, 2022. Additionally, the parties are reminded that, per the Court's #3 Order, all requests for extensions of time must be filed at least four business days prior to the affected deadline. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 6, 2022. (lcckk1)
August 31, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION served on 8/16/2022; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 8/16/2022; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT served on 8/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service (CBP), #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Service (ICE))(Bartkowski, Paul)
August 31, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 08/18/2022. (Bartkowski, Paul)
August 31, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/9/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/8/2022. (Bartkowski, Paul)
August 28, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia K. McBride on behalf of All Defendants (McBride, Patricia)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/2/22. (DM)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl)
August 2, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zmrl)
July 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9405842) filed by CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons DHS Summons, #3 Summons ICE Summons, #4 Summons CBP Summons, #5 Summons AG Summons, #6 Summons US Atty Summons, #7 Exhibit Ex. 1, #8 Exhibit Ex. 2, #9 Exhibit Ex. 3, #10 Exhibit Ex. 4, #11 Exhibit Ex. 5, #12 Exhibit Ex. 6, #13 Exhibit Ex. 7, #14 Exhibit Ex. 8, #15 Exhibit Ex. 9, #16 Exhibit Ex. 10, #17 Exhibit Ex. 11, #18 Exhibit Ex. 12, #19 Exhibit Ex. 13, #20 Exhibit Ex. 14, #21 Exhibit Ex. 15, #22 Exhibit Ex. 16, #23 Exhibit Ex. 17, #24 Supplement Exhibit List)(Bartkowski, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Represented By: Paul Michael Bartkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Represented By: Patricia K. McBride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Represented By: Patricia K. McBride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Represented By: Patricia K. McBride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?