NGUYEN v. MAYORKAS et al
DIEU HANG NGUYEN |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, MERRICK GARLAND, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MERRICK B. GARLAND |
1:2022cv02323 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Carl J Nichols |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DIEU HANG NGUYEN (Haskell, Charles) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Marco Pignone, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9432044. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by DIEU HANG NGUYEN. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Haskell, Charles) |
NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Marco Pignone, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9432044. Fee Status: Fee Paid.. The following error(s) need correction: Pro Hac Vice motion must be accompanied by a Certificate of Good Standing issued within the last 30 days (LCvR 83.2(c)(2)). Please file certificate as an Errata (zed) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Filing 3 ERRATA by DIEU HANG NGUYEN re #1 Complaint, filed by DIEU HANG NGUYEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A - G, #3 Summons Summons for Each Named Defendant)(Haskell, Charles) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/8/2022) (znmg). |
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (znmg) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #2 Errata re: Civil Cover Sheet; emailed to charles@charleshaskell.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, ) |
Filing 2 ERRATA by DIEU HANG NGUYEN re #1 Complaint, filed by DIEU HANG NGUYEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A - G, #3 Summons Summons for Each Named Defendant)(Haskell, Charles) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/8/2022) (znmg). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9422258) filed by DIEU HANG NGUYEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A - G, #3 Summons Summons for Each Named Defendant)(Haskell, Charles) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/5/2022) (znmg). |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet; emailed to charles@charleshaskell.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.