LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A., v. NISAN PERFUMES AND WATCHES, INC. et al
| LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A., and LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. |
| NISAN PERFUME AND WATCHES, INC., TSOLOMON BATTSENGEL and NISAN PERFUMES AND WATCHES, INC. |
| 1:2022cv02337 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) DISMISSING this matter, with prejudice, pursuant to plaintiff's #11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to all defendants and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on September 20, 2022. (lcbah3)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. (Rezvani, Tracy) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer to the Complaint due by 9/20/2022. (ztg) |
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) GRANTING defendants' #10 Uncontested Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint, and DIRECTING defendants Nisan Perfumes and Watches, Inc. and Tsolomon Battsengel to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by September 20, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on September 7, 2022. (lcbah3)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Amended Complaint by TSOLOMON BATTSENGEL, NISAN PERFUMES AND WATCHES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion)(Mohamed, Tesfaye) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Tesfaye Mohamed on behalf of All Defendants (Mohamed, Tesfaye) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. TSOLOMON BATTSENGEL served on 8/18/2022, answer due 9/8/2022 (Rezvani, Tracy) |
| Filing 7 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. (Rezvani, Tracy) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NISAN PERFUMES AND WATCHES, INC. served on 8/18/2022, answer due 9/8/2022 (Rezvani, Tracy) |
| Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent and/or trademark. (znmw) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on August 18, 2022. (lcbah3)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to TSOLOMON BATTSENGEL, NISAN PERFUMES AND WATCHES, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zmrl) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA to Complaint by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. re #1 Amended Complaint,,,. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Rezvani, Tracy) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to tracy@rezvanilaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9426185) filed by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons BATTSENGEL, #3 Summons NISAN PERFUME AND WATCHES, INC.)(Rezvani, Tracy) Modified on 8/9/2022 to correct docket entry text (zsb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
