PITTMAN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff: ELLEN PITTMAN
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Case Number: 1:2022cv02360
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: James E Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) Leave to amend the pleadings and/or join additional parties will be sought by November 28, 2022; (2) Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) shall be exchanged by November 4, 2022; (3) Proponent's Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures and reports shall be due by January 5, 2023; (4) Opponent's Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures and reports shall be due by February 15, 2023; and (5) Discovery shall commence on October 5, 2022, and shall close by March 31, 2023. A status hearing is scheduled for April 6, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/5/2022. (lcjeb2)
October 5, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/28/2022. Initial Disclosure due by 11/4/2022. Plaintiff Rule 26(a)(2) due by 1/5/2023. Defendant Rule 26(a)(2) due by 2/15/2023. Discovery due by 3/31/2023. (znbn)
October 5, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge James E. Boasberg: Video Initial Scheduling Conference held on 10/5/2022. Post Discovery Status Conference set for 4/6/2023 at 10:30 AM in Telephonic/VTC before Judge James E. Boasberg. Scheduling Order forthcoming. (Court Reporter Lisa Griffith) (nbn)
October 4, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Gerard Bastien on behalf of ELLEN PITTMAN (Bastien, Daniel)
September 20, 2022 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 10/5/2022 at 11:30 AM in Telephonic/VTC before Judge James E. Boasberg. (nbn)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: Upon request of counsel, the Initial Scheduling Conference set for September 30, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED and RESET for October 5, 2022, at 11:30 a.m. via Zoom. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/20/2022. (lcjeb2)
September 13, 2022 Filing 9 Receipt on 9/13/2022 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2022 CA 002982 V. (ztth)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Stipulation of Confidentiality of Discovery Material. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/23/2022. (lcjeb2)
August 23, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Confidentiality of Discovery Material by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Gaffney, Donna)
August 23, 2022 Filing 6 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Gaffney, Donna)
August 16, 2022 Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/30/2022 at 01:30 PM in Telephonic/VTC before Judge James E. Boasberg. (nbn)
August 16, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal,, (zmrl) (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/19/2022) (znmw).
August 16, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zmrl)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: A telephonic Initial Scheduling Conference is set for September 30, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall meet, confer, and submit a joint report pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and Local Rule 16.3. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 08/16/2022. (lcjeb3)
August 15, 2022 Filing 4 ERRATA Amended Notice of Removal by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY re Notice of QC- New Case,. (Gaffney, Donna)
August 15, 2022 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to dlgaffney@wmata.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata. (zmrl, )
August 10, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY.(Gaffney, Donna)
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (Gaffney, Donna)
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2022 CA 002982 V Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-9432562 filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Superior Court Documents Civil Information Sheet, #3 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #4 Superior Court Documents Initial Order & Addendum, #5 Superior Court Documents Interrogatories, #6 Superior Court Documents Request for Production of Documents)(Gaffney, Donna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PITTMAN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELLEN PITTMAN
Represented By: Daniel Gerard Bastien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Represented By: Donna Lynn Gaffney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?