NAVARRETE v. WHOLE FOODS
VICTOR NAVARRETE |
WHOLE FOODS |
1:2022cv02393 |
August 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY to opposition to motion re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by VICTOR NAVARRETE. (znmw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2022: #1 Exhibits) (znmw). |
Filing 8 Receipt on 9/20/2022 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2022 CA 02945 B. (znmw) |
Filing 9 REPLY to opposition to motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss , or in the Alternative, For Summary Judgment MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WHOLE FOODS. (See Docket Entry #7 to view document). (znmw) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by WHOLE FOODS. (Kaplan, Steven) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Tobias on behalf of WHOLE FOODS (Tobias, Bradley) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by VICTOR NAVARRETE. "Leave to File Granted," signed by Judge Amy B. Jackson on 9/6/2022. (znmw) |
Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment on or before September 16, 2022. If plaintiff fails to file a timely response, the Court may grant the motion to dismiss as conceded or accept any facts set forth in defendants motion for summary judgment as true, and it may decide the matter in defendants favor without the benefit of plaintiff's position. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 8/19/2022. (lcabj1) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss , or in the Alternative, For Summary Judgment by WHOLE FOODS. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1- Statement of Facts, #3 Exhibit 1 to SOF, #4 Exhibit 2 to SOF, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Steven). Added MOTION for Summary Judgment on 8/22/2022 (zjm). |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2022 CA 02945 Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-9439421 filed by WHOLE FOODS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Counsel/Party, #3 Superior Court Documents, #4 Notice of Filing Removal)(Kaplan, Steven) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: NAVARRETE v. WHOLE FOODS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: VICTOR NAVARRETE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WHOLE FOODS | |
Represented By: | Steven E. Kaplan |
Represented By: | Bradley Tobias |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.