CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Case Number: 1:2022cv02456
Filed: August 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Jia M Cobb
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: Parties shall file a joint status report by December 12, 2022. See document for scheduling order and information concerning case procedures. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on October 14, 2022. (lcjmc2)
October 12, 2022 Filing 13 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Future Proceedings by UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haberland, John)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Parties confer and submit a joint proposed schedule for further proceedings, which shall include a proposed schedule for the processing and release of responsive records or for briefing dispositive motions, by October 12, 2022. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on September 28, 2022. (lcjmc2)
September 27, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.(Haberland, John)
September 27, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John Haberland on behalf of UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (Haberland, John)
September 1, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David P. Ross on behalf of CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC. (Ross, David)
August 31, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- David P. Ross, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9483562. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David P. Ross, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Brooks)
August 31, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Scott Mills, Jr on behalf of CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC. (Mills, Thomas)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney David P. Ross is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear in this matter. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on August 31, 2022. (lcjmc2)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney T. Scott Mills is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear in this matter. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on August 26, 2022. (lcjmc2)
August 25, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- T. Scott Mills, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9469566. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of T. Scott Mills, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Brooks)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Permission to Use Post Office Box: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to List P.O. Box As Plaintiff's Address, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff may proceed with a P.O. Box as its address for purpose of Local Rule 5.1(c). Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on August 22, 2022. (lcjmc2)
August 19, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl)
August 19, 2022 Filing 4 Case Assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. (zmrl) Modified on 9/7/2022 (znmw).
August 17, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Permission to Use Post Office Box Complaint With P.O. Box As Plaintiff's Address by CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Brooks) Modified event on 8/19/2022 (znmw).
August 17, 2022 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC. (Smith, Brooks)
August 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9450531) filed by CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Smith, Brooks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WAINSCOTT, INC.
Represented By: Brooks M. Smith
Represented By: David P. Ross
Represented By: Thomas Scott Mills, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Represented By: John Haberland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?