MPOY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
BRUNO K. MPOY |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN BURST and DONIELLE POWE |
1:2022cv02501 |
August 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Beryl A Howell |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued as to All Defendants, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor; sent to the U.S. Marshalls Service. (znmg) |
MINUTE ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the Clerk shall prepare and issue the summonses and coordinate with the U.S. Marshal to serve process upon each defendant. SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on 9/23/2022. (psu1) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (znmg) |
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's motion #2 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk shall assign this case randomly to a district judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 9/20/2022. (psu1) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by BRUNO K. MPOY. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by BRUNO K. MPOY. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 08/22/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.