AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
| AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and STATE DEPARTMENT |
| 1:2022cv02581 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. Before the Court in this Freedom of Information Act case are a Complaint and an Answer. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3, the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) are inapplicable. It is hereby ORDERED that the Parties shall confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before November 14, 2022. The Joint Status Report shall address: (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated dates for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); (5) the possibility of prioritizing documents responsive to Plaintiff's request and any discussions regarding whether Plaintiff's request can be narrowed; and (6) whether the Parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on October 24, 2022. (lccjn1)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE.(Silverman, Bradley) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Silverman on behalf of All Defendants (Silverman, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/15/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/15/2022. (Monaghan, John) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General September 14, 2022. (Monaghan, John) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 9/8/2022 (Sisney, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Paul Sisney on behalf of AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (Sisney, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on September 2, 2022. (lccjn1)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (znmg) |
| Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (Monaghan, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Monaghan on behalf of AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (Monaghan, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE DEPARTMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9472337) filed by AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A --- FOIA Request, #2 Exhibit B --- Acknowledgement, #3 Summons AG, #4 Summons DOJ US Atty, #5 Summons State Dept., #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Monaghan, John) (Attachment 6 replaced on 8/29/2022) (znmg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
