CEVALLOS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
| DANIEL CARDENAS CEVALLOS |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and RENA BITTER |
| 1:2022cv02602 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zcb, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9477480) filed by DANIEL CARDENAS CEVALLOS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Hampe, Carl)
|
|
ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to champe@fragomen.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zcb, ) Modified on 8/30/2022 (znmg).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
