RAFIQUE v. GARLAND et al
| MUHAMMAD USMAN RAFIQUE |
| MERRICK GARLAND, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ANGELA COLYVAS-MCGINNIS and JOHN DOES #1-#10 |
| 1:2022cv02624 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on September 20, 2022. (lccjn2)
|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/2/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/1/2022. (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, ANGELA COLYVAS-MCGINNIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb,) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zcb,) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9480558) filed by MUHAMMAD USMAN RAFIQUE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Summons All Defendants, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nimer, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
