NGUYEN v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
| ATONY NGUYEN |
| ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW WEISS, LAW OFFICES OF HOANG HUY TU, THIEN TRAN AND HIS GANG, NGOC BICH NGUYEN, BICH AN NGUYEN, MOHAMED MANASTRA, ATIR MANASTRA, HAI TRUNG HOANG and DOES 1-10 |
| 1:2022cv02646 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Summons Issued, Sent to ATONY NGUYEN. (zjm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interest of Parties by ATONY NGUYEN (zjm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by ATONY NGUYEN. (zjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, HAI TRUNG HOANG, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW WEISS, LAW OFFICES OF HOANG HUY TU, ATIR MANASTRA, MOHAMED MANASTRA, BICH AN NGUYEN, NGOC BICH NGUYEN, SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, THIEN TRAN AND HIS GANG ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 203023) with Jury Demand filed by ATONY NGUYEN. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm) |
| Summons (10) Issued as to HAI TRUNG HOANG, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW WEISS, LAW OFFICES OF HOANG HUY TU, ATIR MANASTRA, MOHAMED MANASTRA, BICH AN NGUYEN, NGOC BICH NGUYEN, SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, THIEN TRAN AND HIS GANG. (zjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
