BACA v. CPI/GV CRESTVIEW ESTATES OWNER, LLC et al
| FRANCES DARLENE BACA |
| CPI/GV CRESTVIEW ESTATES OWNER, LLC, CRESTVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES, LLC and DANIEL A. D'ANIELLO |
| 1:2022cv02659 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by FRANCES DARLENE BACA; "Leave to file motion is GRANTED." Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/24/2022. (ztnr) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 09/20/2022. (zsb)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 09/20/2022. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by FRANCES DARLENE BACA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(rj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by FRANCES DARLENE BACA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(rj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/1/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (rj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
