NAKAMURA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff: YOSHIE NAKAMURA and S. N.
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case Number: 1:2022cv02704
Filed: September 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Tanya S Chutkan
Referring Judge: G Michael Harvey
Nature of Suit: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for full case management. (zsl)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.1, they may consent to referral of this action to the magistrate judge for all purposes. If the parties consent to such a referral, a notice of consent signed by the parties shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court. The parties are hereby advised, however, that they may decline to make such an election, without adverse substantive consequences. Local Civil Rule 73.1(b). No further action is required if the parties decline to make the election. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/19/2022. (lcja)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The court has determined that this action should be referred to a Magistrate Judge for full case management up to and including issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive motions, but excluding trial. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is referred to a magistrate judge, beginning immediately; the magistrate judge will be randomly assigned by the Clerk's Office; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that any future filings related to this matter shall have the initials of the presiding judge and the magistrate judge following the case number in the caption. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/19/2022. (lcja)
October 18, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Hardy, Tasha)
September 12, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS(2)Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb, )
September 12, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zcb, )
September 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9500979) filed by YOSHIE NAKAMURA, S. N.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Jones, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NAKAMURA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YOSHIE NAKAMURA
Represented By: Robert Wilson Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S. N.
Represented By: Robert Wilson Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Represented By: Tasha Monique Hardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?