KHAN v. BLINKEN et al
MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN |
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, JULIE M. STUFFT, MARY CHENG, PATRICIA A LACINA and BRIAN HEATH |
1:2022cv02714 |
September 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Carl J Nichols |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN. (Mahajan, Timothy) |
Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of Maryland; Case Number 1:22-cv-01567. Original file ,transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Parties' Consent Motion to Transfer. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 9/1/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Transfer Case by Anthony J. Blinken, Mary Cheng, Merrick B. Garland, Brian Heath, Patricia A. Lacina, Alejandro Mayorkas, Julie M. Stufft, Richard C. Visek (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shelton, Alicia) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer by Anthony J. Blinken, Mary Cheng, Merrick B. Garland, Brian Heath, Patricia A. Lacina, Alejandro Mayorkas, Julie M. Stufft, Richard C. Visek (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Shelton, Alicia) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alicia Leigh Shelton on behalf of All Defendants (Shelton, Alicia) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Case Reassigned to Judge Richard D. Bennett. Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 4 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson on 6/27/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Mohammed Imran Khan or counsel for Mohammed Imran Khan are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 7/11/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Anthony J. Blinken, Mary Cheng, Merrick B. Garland, Brian Heath, Patricia A. Lacina, Alejandro Mayorkas, Julie M. Stufft, Richard C. Visek, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10013085.), filed by MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit)(Mahajan, Timothy) [Transferred from Maryland on 9/9/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.