SPARACINO PLLC v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
Plaintiff: SPARACINO PLLC
Defendant: UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
Case Number: 1:2022cv02728
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Yee, Marsha)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant must file an answer to the complaint or otherwise respond by November 8, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 10/27/2022. (lcabj2)
October 21, 2022 Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND served on 9/19/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Duffy, Matthew)
October 21, 2022 Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Duffy, Matthew)
October 21, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/30/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Duffy, Matthew)
October 17, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Marsha Wellknown Yee on behalf of UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND (Yee, Marsha)
September 13, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl)
September 13, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zmrl)
September 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Ruck on behalf of SPARACINO PLLC (Ruck, James)
September 9, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew M. Duffy on behalf of SPARACINO PLLC (Duffy, Matthew)
September 9, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Edward Goldsmith on behalf of SPARACINO PLLC (Goldsmith, Andrew)
September 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9504847) filed by SPARACINO PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons to United States Central Command, #4 Summons to DOJ, #5 Summons to USAO DC)(Branson, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPARACINO PLLC v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SPARACINO PLLC
Represented By: James Ruck
Represented By: Andrew Edward Goldsmith
Represented By: Matthew M. Duffy
Represented By: Joshua Daniel Branson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
Represented By: Marsha Wellknown Yee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?