YANG v. HELLER et al
| YUKUN YANG |
| JAMES HELLER, DAVID MEALE and ANTONY BLINKEN |
| 1:2022cv02767 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/14/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/13/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 09/19/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 9/19/2022; JAMES HELLER served on 9/19/2022; DAVID MEALE served on 9/19/2022 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, JAMES HELLER, DAVID MEALE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9513297) filed by YUKUN YANG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
