ACEVEDO GONZALEZ et al v. KOYDOL, INC. et al
| ALFREDO ACEVEDO GONZALES, JAVIER ACEVEDO RIVERA, LUIS ALFREDO ACEVEDO RIVERA, JAVIER ACEVEDO RODRIGUEZ, RICARDO GUZMAN ACOSTA and ALFREDO ACEVEDO GONZALEZ |
| KOYDOL, INC., JOSE CRUZ and CARLOS CRUZ |
| 1:2022cv02773 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Amster, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to CARLOS CRUZ (zed) |
| Filing 10 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT by ALFREDO ACEVEDO GONZALEZ, JAVIER ACEVEDO RIVERA, LUIS ALFREDO ACEVEDO RIVERA, JAVIER ACEVEDO RODRIGUEZ, RICARDO GUZMAN ACOSTA. (See Docket Entry #9 to view document). (zed) |
| Filing 9 Affidavit of Default against Defendant Carlos Cruz by ALFREDO ACEVEDO GONZALEZ, JAVIER ACEVEDO RIVERA, LUIS ALFREDO ACEVEDO RIVERA, JAVIER ACEVEDO RODRIGUEZ, RICARDO GUZMAN ACOSTA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Amster, Michael) Modified docket event/text on 10/28/2022 (zed). |
Filing 8
ORDER setting an Initial Scheduling Conference for November 22, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. via videoconference before Judge Amit P. Mehta. See the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/18/2022. (lcapm2)
|
| RESOLVED....NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re #7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by KOYDOL, INC..(Gunderson, Eric).Your attorney renewal has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 10/18/2022. (zbaj) Modified on 10/12/2022 (zbaj). |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by KOYDOL, INC..(Gunderson, Eric) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal re Jose Cruz without Prejudice (Amster, Michael) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JOSE CRUZ served on 9/21/2022, answer due 10/12/2022 (Amster, Michael) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CARLOS CRUZ served on 9/21/2022, answer due 10/12/2022 (Amster, Michael) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. KOYDOL, INC. served on 9/16/2022, answer due 10/7/2022 (Amster, Michael) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9514372) filed by LUIS ALFREDO ACEVEDO RIVERA, JAVIER ACEVEDO RIVERA, ALFREDO ACEVEDO GONZALES, JAVIER ACEVEDO RODRIGUEZ, RICARDO GUZMAN ACOSTA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Koydol, Inc., #3 Summons as to Jose Cruz, #4 Summons as to Carlos Cruz)(Amster, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
