RAVEN v. SAJET
Plaintiff: JULIAN MARCUS RAVEN
Defendant: KIM SAJET
Case Number: 1:2022cv02809
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Christopher R Cooper
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by JULIAN MARCUS RAVEN. (zjm)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS (3) Issued as to KIM SAJET, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zjm)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KIM SAJET ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 203018) filed by JULIAN MARCUS RAVEN. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm) .
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Not Issued as to KIM SAJET (zjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RAVEN v. SAJET
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JULIAN MARCUS RAVEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIM SAJET
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?