ELLIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| PRISCILLA ELLIS |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, EUEREH COLTRELL, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and MICHAEL CARR |
| 1:2022cv02836 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
PRO SE ORDER directing, within 30 days of this Order, unless an extension of time is granted, plaintiff to provide a six month trust fund prisoner account statement and failure to comply will result in dismissal of case. Plaintiff shall provide the requested information specific within this order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/27/2022. (ztnr)
|
| Filing 3 PARTIAL PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by PRISCILLA ELLIS (zmrl) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/27/2022) (zmrl). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PRISCILLA ELLIS. (zmrl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by PRISCILLA ELLIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(zmrl) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/12/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmrl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
