WITCHARD v. WRIGHT ALLEN et al
| JOSEPH WITCHARD |
| ARENDA L. WRIGHT ALLEN, ROGER L. GREGORY, MERRICK GARLAND and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE |
| 1:2022cv02942 |
| September 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Mandamus & Other (Other) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct by RENAMING RESPONDENT IN THIS MATTER #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus by JOSEPH WITCHARD. (zcb, ) |
Filing 3
PRO SE ORDER directing within 30 days of this Order, unless an extension of time is granted, plaintiff to provide a six month trust fund prisoner account statement and failure to comply will result in dismissal of case. Plaintiff shall provide the requested information specific within this order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail.. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/07/2022. (zcb, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOSEPH WITCHARD. (rj) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus filed by JOSEPH WITCHARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/25/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (rj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
