UMANZOR v. CORINTHIAN CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
| ULISES ALBERTO UMANZOR |
| CORINTHIAN CONTRACTORS, INC., GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC., GILBANE DEVELOPMENT CO., GCS-SIGAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC and TRINITY GROUP CONSTRUCTION, INC. |
| 1:2022cv02967 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE. CORINTHIAN CONTRACTORS, INC. waiver sent on 11/7/2022, answer due 1/6/2023. (Rosenberg, David) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/4/2022) (znmw). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9569109) filed by ULISES ALBERTO UMANZOR. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Corinthian Contractors, Inc., #2 Summons as to Grunley Construction Co., Inc., #3 Summons as to Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc., #4 Summons as to Gilbane Development Co., #5 Summons as to GCS-Sigal Construction Company, LLC, #6 Summons as to Trinity Group Construction, Inc., #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Greenberg, Gregg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
