AZIZ v. GARLAND et al
| SUMBAL AZIZ |
| MERRICK GARLAND, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ANGELA COLYVAS-MCGINNIS and JOHN DOES #1-#10 |
| 1:2022cv02977 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SUMBAL AZIZ (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/4/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/3/2022. (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, ANGELA COLYVAS-MCGINNIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (znmw) Modified on 10/4/2022 (znmw). |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9571973) filed by SUMBAL AZIZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Summons all defendants, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nimer, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
