INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
| INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH |
| FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| 1:2022cv03003 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER. Both a Complaint and an Answer are now before the court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before December 9, 2022. The Joint Status Report shall include (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); and (5) whether the parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/28/2022. (lcapm2)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION.(Hammond, Derek) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. Defendant's Answer shall now be due on or before November 25, 2022. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/4/2022. (lcapm2)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hammond, Derek) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Derek S. Hammond on behalf of All Defendants (Hammond, Derek) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Cochran Horner on behalf of INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH (Horner, Christopher) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9576763) filed by INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH. (Attachments: #1 Summons to agency, US Attorney, and US Attorney General, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hardin, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH | |
| Represented By: | Matthew D. Hardin |
| Represented By: | Christopher Cochran Horner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Derek S. Hammond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
