WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. TOGGAS et al
| WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. |
| THOMAS TOGGAS and KATHRYN ANN TOGGAS |
| 1:2022cv03093 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Receipt on 12/8/2022 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2016 CA 002847 R(RP). (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10)(znmw) |
| Case Remanded to Superior Court re #4 Order Remanding Case to State Court; sent by email. (zed) |
Filing 4
ORDER remanding case back to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 10/14/2022. (hmc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by THOMAS TOGGAS. Case related to Case No. 19-3407. (zed) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party (zed) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by THOMAS TOGGAS from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2016 CA 002847 R(RP). (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 203197) filed by THOMAS TOGGAS. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(zed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
