TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO |
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DONALD J. TRUMP, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, CHRISTIE CLARK, MISTY MICHAELS, CRAIG ROBERTSON, LARRY BENNETT, GORMAN E. GETTY, III, JOHN JAMES JONES, HAILEY MYERS ZACHARY FROST, JAMES FROST and JASON MERRITT |
1:2022cv03115 |
October 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the #2 application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/28/2022. (ztnr) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIAM TACCINO. (zmrl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by CAROL TACCINO, WILLIAM TACCINO. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zmrl) #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmrl). . |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/11/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmrl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.