DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC. et al v. BECERRA
| DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC., NORTHERN HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SURRY COUNTY doing business as NORTHERN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, CORNING HOSPITAL, UPMC SOMERSET, UPMC HAMOT, UPMC ALTOONA, UPMC KANE, UPMC BEDFORD and UPMC CHAUTAUQUA |
| XAVIER BECERRA |
| 1:2022cv03136 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CORNING HOSPITAL, DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC., NORTHERN HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SURRY COUNTY, UPMC ALTOONA, UPMC BEDFORD, UPMC CHAUTAUQUA, UPMC HAMOT, UPMC KANE, UPMC SOMERSET (Glazer, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9600766) filed by UPMC HAMOT, UPMC ALTOONA, UPMC BEDFORD, NORTHERN HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SURRY COUNTY, UPMC KANE, CORNING HOSPITAL, DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC., UPMC CHAUTAUQUA, UPMC SOMERSET. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Secretary of HHS, #4 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #5 Summons U.S. Attorney)(Glazer, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
