JARRAHIAN v. OUDKIRK et al
| AZAD JARRAHIAN |
| SCOTT M. OUDKIRK and ANTONY BLINKEN |
| 1:2022cv03227 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/25/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/24/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/1/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 11/1/2022; SCOTT M. OUDKIRK served on 11/1/2022 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, SCOTT M. OUDKIRK, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY BLINKEN, SCOTT M. OUDKIRK ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9617272) filed by AZAD JARRAHIAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
