KENNY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
SHAWN KENNY, OKSANA KENNY, LUCILLE SELIG, ESTATE OF HERBERT SELIG and JILL LASMAN |
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS |
1:2022cv03299 |
October 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Trevor N McFadden |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Waiver of Local Rule 5.1(e) by ESTATE OF HERBERT SELIG, OKSANA KENNY, SHAWN KENNY, JILL LASMAN, LUCILLE SELIG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kalik, Tracy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Tipograph on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Tipograph, Joseph) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy Reichman Kalik on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kalik, Tracy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Noel Jason Nudelman on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Nudelman, Noel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Plaintiffs. Case related to Case No. 19-cv-02889. (Heideman, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9633197) filed by SHAWN KENNY, ESTATE OF HERBERT SELIG, LUCILLE SELIG, OKSANA KENNY, JILL LASMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Heideman, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.