BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff: EMERSON BRADLEY,individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and EMERSON BRADLEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Case Number: 1:2022cv03442
Filed: November 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Reggie B Walton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 GENERAL ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE THE HONORABLE REGGIE B. WALTON. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on January 6, 2023. (lcrbw1)
December 30, 2022 Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/30/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/29/2023. (Bennett, Leonard)
December 22, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Drew David Sarrett on behalf of EMERSON BRADLEY (Sarrett, Drew)
December 22, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Dillon on behalf of EMERSON BRADLEY (Dillon, Kevin)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered the plaintiff's #5 and #6 Motion[s] for Admission of Attorney[s], and it appearing to the Court that the attorneys referenced therein meet the requirements for pro hac vice admission under this Court's rules, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's #5 and #6 Motions are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that (1) Kevin A. Dillon, Consumer Litigation Associates, P.C., 626 E. Broad St., Ste. 300, Richmond, VA, 23219, and (2) Drew D. Sarrett, Consumer Litigation Associates, P.C., 626 E. Broad St., Ste. 300, Richmond, VA, 23219, are ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice in this case. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on December 21, 2022. (lcrbw1)
November 17, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Drew David Sarrett, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9681248. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by EMERSON BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Drew David Sarrett, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Bennett, Leonard)
November 17, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Kevin Anthony Dillon, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9681192. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by EMERSON BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Kevin A. Dillon, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Bennett, Leonard)
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth)
November 10, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE to Attorney General of the United States and Channing D. Phillips, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia re #2 Complaint, filed by EMERSON BRADLEY. Related document: #2 Complaint, filed by EMERSON BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Bennett, Leonard)
November 10, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zcb)
November 10, 2022 NOTICE OF ERROR re #2 Complaint; emailed to lenbennett@clalegal.com, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (Briggs, Charles)
November 9, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9662442) filed by EMERSON BRADLEY, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons United States Department of Education)(Bennett, Leonard) Modified fee information on 11/16/2022 (znmw).
November 9, 2022 Filing 1 ENTERED IN ERROR.....COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9662442) filed by EMERSON BRADLEY,individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated.(Bennett, Leonard) Modified on 11/10/2022 (zcb).....DOCUMENT RE-FILED STARTING AT #2

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMERSON BRADLEY,individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Leonard Anthony Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMERSON BRADLEY
Represented By: Drew David Sarrett
Represented By: Leonard Anthony Bennett
Represented By: Kevin Dillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?