MCFIELD v. MCDONOUGH et al
Plaintiff: SHAUNTA MCFIELD
Defendant: DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and RAUL JOSIAH
Case Number: 1:2022cv03519
Filed: November 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Amit P Mehta
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #9 Motion to Continue. Defendant's Response shall be due on or before February 14, 2023. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/23/2022. (lcapm1) Modified deadline on 12/27/2022 (zjd).
December 21, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Continue by RAUL JOSIAH. (zed)
December 20, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to SHAUNTA MCFIELD. Attorney James Francis Wallington terminated. (Wallington, James)
December 14, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/2/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/31/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/05/2022. (Fitzgerald, Diana)
December 13, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. RAUL JOSIAH served on 12/5/2022; DENIS R. MCDONOUGH served on 12/5/2022 (Fitzgerald, Diana)
December 9, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Isaacson on behalf of SHAUNTA MCFIELD (Isaacson, David)
December 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana L. Fitzgerald on behalf of SHAUNTA MCFIELD (Fitzgerald, Diana)
December 5, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jarrett Adams on behalf of SHAUNTA MCFIELD (Adams, Jarrett)
November 18, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to RAUL JOSIAH, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl)
November 18, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsl)
November 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9681348) filed by SHAUNTA MCFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Wallington, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCFIELD v. MCDONOUGH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHAUNTA MCFIELD
Represented By: James Francis Wallington
Represented By: Jarrett Adams
Represented By: Diana L. Fitzgerald
Represented By: David C. Isaacson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENIS R. MCDONOUGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAUL JOSIAH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?