HUNTER v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY
| ERNEST HUNTER |
| WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
| 1:2022cv03552 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's #8 Notice. It appears Defendant intended to file the Notice in related case Hunter v. WMATA, 18-cv-1494, and not in this case. As such, the #8 Notice is STRICKEN from the record. Defense counsel shall refile the #8 Notice on the appropriate docket forthwith. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on January 11, 2023. (lcckk1)
|
| Filing 8 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO MINUTE ORDER FILED 1/11/2023.....NOTICE of Late Filing by ERNEST HUNTER re #7 Response to motion (Branch, David) Modified on 1/12/2023 (zdot). |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Count II filed by ERNEST HUNTER. (Branch, David) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before 12/30/2022. Defendant shall file its reply on or before 1/11/2023. (dot) |
| Filing 6 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Count II by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Guss, Michael) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's #6 Partial Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before December 30, 2022, and Defendant shall file its reply on or before January 11, 2023. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on December 12, 2022. (lcckk1)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 12/1/22. (DM)
|
| Filing 4 Case directly reassigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly as there is an earlier related case. Judge Carl J. Nichols is no longer assigned to the case. (rj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by ERNEST HUNTER. Case related to Case No. 18-1494. (Branch, David) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zljn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CDCDC-9688739) filed by ERNEST HUNTER. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Branch, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HUNTER v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ERNEST HUNTER | |
| Represented By: | David A. Branch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | Michael Kelly Guss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
