JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
1:2022cv03560 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond, Dkt. #7 , it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before February 2, 2023. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 12/27/2022. (lcrdm2) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeGenaro, Stephen) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen DeGenaro on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DeGenaro, Stephen) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/1/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/31/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/7/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 12/6/2022 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Brooke Paz)(Blankenberg, Kathryn) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/28/2022. (lcrdm2) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zsl) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Blankenberg, Kathryn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9690215) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #4 Summons U.S. Attorney)(Blankenberg, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | |
Represented By: | Kathryn Brooke Blankenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
Represented By: | Stephen DeGenaro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.