ASCENSION ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
| ASCENSION ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL and ASCENSION ALL SAINTS HOSPITAL |
| XAVIER BECERRA |
| 1:2022cv03593 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zcb) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ASCENSION ALL SAINTS HOSPITAL, ASCENSION ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL (Rubin, Lori) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against XAVIER BECERRA in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9700007) filed by ASCENSION ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, ASCENSION ALL SAINTS HOSPITAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rubin, Lori) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
