TREADWELL v. RACINE
| Ms. Claudia Treadwell and CLAUDIA TREADWELL |
| KARL A. RACINE |
| 1:2022cv03616 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint and Amended Complaint by CLAUDIA TREADWELL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Day, Charles)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT against KARL A. RACINE with Jury Demand filed by CLAUDIA TREADWELL. (Attachments: #1 Redline Version of Amended Complaint, #2 Summons to AG Brian Schwalb in his Official Capacity, #3 Summons to D.C. Mayor)(Day, Charles)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to KARL A. RACINE, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zmrl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Karl Racine, DC OAG not against Claudia Treadwell with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9707701) filed by Claudia Treadwell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to DC Office of Attorney General, #3 Summons to Exec. Office of DC Mayor)(Day, Charles)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
