PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX v. GRAHAM-DRAKE et al
| MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX |
| AUBREY GRAHAM-DRAKE, UMG, REPUBLIC RECORDS and OVO |
| 1:2022cv03693 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX; Notice. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED because this case was closed on December 13, 2022 and this document does not contain a cognizable motion". Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 1/10/2023. (zed) |
| Filing 6 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX; Notice. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED because this case was closed on December 13, 2022 and this document does not contain a cognizable motion".. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 1/10/2023. (zed) |
| Filing 5 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX; Notice. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED because this case was closed on December 13, 2022 and this document does not contain a cognizable motion". Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 1/10/2023. (zed) |
MINUTE ORDER. The Court has received six letters from the plaintiff for which it has denied leave to file, as the case was closed on December 13, 2022 and the letters do not contain any cognizable motions. The Court ORDERS that, absent extraordinary circumstances, the plaintiff shall NOT be permitted to file any other documents in this case unless ordered to do so by the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff's address of record. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 10, 2023. (lcdlf1)
|
| Filing 4 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX; NOTICE. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED because this case was closed on December 13, 2022 and this document does not contain a cognizable motion". Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 1/3/2022. (zed) |
| Filing 3 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX; Notice. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED because this case was closed on December 13, 2022 and this document does not contain a cognizable motion." Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 12/27/2022. (zed) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER dismissing the plaintiff's #1 Complaint. See text for details. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff's address of record and close this case. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on December 13, 2022. (lcdlf1)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AUBREY GRAHAM-DRAKE, OVO, REPUBLIC RECORDS, UMG ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 203603) with Jury Demand filed by MICHELDEANGELOU PERFVWAYBELAYOUIX. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zed) |
| Summons (1) Issued as to AUBREY GRAHAM-DRAKE. (zed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
