PARTEM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
VERA PARTEM |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
UNITED STATES and ANTHONY J. BLINKEN |
1:2022cv03729 |
December 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
John D Bates |
Other Statutory Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/3/2023. (lcjdb1) Modified on 1/4/2023 to reflect that this is a "minute" - paperless order. (jth). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Madison Kewin, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9762699. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by VERA PARTEM. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Bercovici, Michelle) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zsl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9735342) filed by VERA PARTEM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Court Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons (Sec. of State), #3 Summons Summons (USAG), #4 Summons Summons (USAG DC))(Bercovici, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.