BYRD v. BACERRA
Plaintiff: CORETTE BYRD
Defendant: XAVIER BACERRA
Case Number: 1:2022cv03746
Filed: December 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Tanya S Chutkan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order RESOLVED...NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re #6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/28/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/26/2023. (Renaud, Ellen).Your attorney renewal/government certification has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 1/25/2023. (zbaj) Modified on 1/19/2023 (zbaj).
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/28/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/26/2023. (Renaud, Ellen)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/28/2022. (Renaud, Ellen)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. XAVIER BACERRA served on 12/28/2022 (Renaud, Ellen)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline Michelle Whitlock on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Whitlock, Caroline)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to XAVIER BACERRA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (znmw)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against XAVIER BACERRA with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9740277) filed by CORETTE BYRD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Renaud, Ellen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BYRD v. BACERRA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CORETTE BYRD
Represented By: Ellen Kyriacou Renaud
Represented By: Caroline Michelle Whitlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XAVIER BACERRA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?