MINES et al v. METAGENICS, INC.
| INSTITUTE OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEDICINE D/B/A West End Apothecary, AHMAD MINES and INSTITUTE OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEDICINE doing business as WEST END APOTHECARY |
| METAGENICS, INC. |
| 1:2022cv03789 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by METAGENICS, INC. (Todd, Gordon)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss by METAGENICS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Todd, Gordon)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by METAGENICS, INC.. Case related to Case No. 1:22-cv-01308-JEB. (Todd, Gordon)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Gordon D. Todd on behalf of METAGENICS, INC. (Todd, Gordon)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to METAGENICS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zljn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against METAGENICS, INC. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9749642) filed by INSTITUTE OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEDICINE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits, #3 Summons Summons for defendant Metagenics)(Norris, Amy) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/23/2022) (zljn).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
