KAYODE v. GARLAND
| EVELYN KAYODE |
| MERRICK GARLAND |
| 1:2022cv03802 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by MERRICK GARLAND. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Berhane, Fithawi)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Government's #9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time is granted. The Government shall file its response by March 27, 2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 2/17/2023. (lctnm1)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Fithawi Berhane on behalf of MERRICK GARLAND (Berhane, Fithawi)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MERRICK GARLAND served on 12/28/2022 (Swick, Richard)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #4 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant. The following error(s) need correction: Select parties that have been served and enter date of delivery (not date mailed). Please refile. (zed)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/27/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/25/2023. (Swick, Richard)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/28/2022. (Swick, Richard)
|
|
Filing 4
ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. EVELYN KAYODE served on 12/28/2022 (Swick, Richard) Modified on 1/26/2023 (zed).
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/23/2022. (lctnm1)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zcb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against MERRICK GARLAND with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9751208) filed by EVELYN KAYODE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Swick, Richard) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/23/2022) (zcb).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KAYODE v. GARLAND | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EVELYN KAYODE | |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Swick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND | |
| Represented By: | Fithawi Berhane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
