NIGHTINGALE v. FISCALNOTE, INC.
| DAVID NIGHTINGALE |
| FISCALNOTE, INC. doing business as CQ ROLL CALL |
| 1:2022cv03839 |
| December 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by FISCALNOTE, INC..(Hepner, Kyle) |
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall respond to the complaint by February 27, 2023. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 1/23/2023. (lccrc2)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by FISCALNOTE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bradley, William) |
| Filing 6 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by FISCALNOTE, INC. (Bradley, William) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Eugene Bradley on behalf of FISCALNOTE, INC. (Bradley, William) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to FISCALNOTE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zljn) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET (Corrected) by DAVID NIGHTINGALE re #1 Complaint, filed by DAVID NIGHTINGALE. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by DAVID NIGHTINGALE.(Rothman, Joel) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/3/2023) (zljn). |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright.. (Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DEMANDED) against FISCALNOTE, INC. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9759256) filed by DAVID NIGHTINGALE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rothman, Joel) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to joel.rothman@sriplaw.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zljn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NIGHTINGALE v. FISCALNOTE, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID NIGHTINGALE | |
| Represented By: | Joel Benjamin Rothman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FISCALNOTE, INC. doing business as CQ ROLL CALL | |
| Represented By: | William Eugene Bradley |
| Represented By: | Kyle Glendon Hepner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
